Augmenting idea's in physcis
I endorse his approach to go back to simpler approaches for the
describing the physical in contrast to what been done in the last 30 years.
I often wonder about the relation between math and physics in the sense that
humans have postulated their math to become an absolute background when viewing
at the physical work. In my view this became the biggest failure for string
theory where math became a dictate for nature to obey.
I would like to endorse and have his viewpoints expanded with a simple model
that could be path forward to modelling this universe. And it came to me when he
described the photon as being ‘everywhere’ since it does not experience time
Now the idea is that our space came from a solid
Superstructure which is not space and time as we know it; parts of it expanded,
exploded or had a state change resulting in this universe.
As an example, why there could be hints for that: the photon in the
superstructure is just a cord between points. In this resulting-universe we
could then see it as a quick event (a flash or like lightning) of a standing
wave (not a trajectory of a particle). It’s a background hint for the
originating superstructure, and the speed of light only pointing to some
indication of a(the) strength of elasticity. Hence explaining why in this universe,
the photon does not experience time (at least time as it is kind of defined in
this universe). Equivalent: because the universe is an ‘extended’ subset of the
superstructure the fact that we see the photon traveling is kind of an illusion
(in our senses and or because we are part of ‘this place’)
The superstructure has, for instance, regions of varying charge and as it
transformed for some reason, we observe resulting stuff such as electro
mechanism ‘in our regional space’
Now the idea is to look at forces and particles as Lego
blocks (for instance) and complete a model which could complete the
superstructure and result to our universe as
we see it. And from that view for instance black holes are gateways to the
superstructure.
Background thinking on that leads to for instance possible answers as to why
the neutrino is needed (only an example) because at first glance in this
universe we could happily do without it.
Following these views the biggest fatality of sting theory
became that it was unable to go beyond using concepts like space and extra
dimensions to explain nature.
I kindly look for people to enhance, assist and build on
these ideas,
Tx
Reacties
Een reactie posten